प्रेरक मानदेय भुगतान प्रकरण में दो अध्यापकों पर निलंबन की गाज, कोर्ट द्वारा कार्यवाही करने का आदेश

प्रेरक मानदेय भुगतान प्रकरण में दो अध्यापकों पर निलंबन की गाज...

विभागीय गलती में शिक्षकों के गले में फंदा...

कुशीनगर :: पडरौना विकासखंड में स्थित ग्रामसभा बढ़वालिया खुर्द में 2011 में ग्राम लोक शिक्षा समिति द्वारा की गयी थी. समिति द्वारा एक महिला और एक पुरुष प्रेरक के नाम का प्रस्ताव करते हुए जिला लोक शिक्षा समिति के अनुमोदन के लिए पत्रावली प्रेषित कर दी.

जिला लोक शिक्षा समिति के यहाँ प्रस्तावित महिला प्रेरक के स्थान पर अन्य महिला का चयन कर लिया गया. जिससे चयन विवादित हो गया. BEO के आदेश से चयनित प्रेरकों को सम्बंधित शिक्षक ने कार्यभार ग्रहण करा लिया किन्तु विवादित प्रकरण की सुनवाई तक तत्कालीन BSA के आदेश से उक्त महिला प्रेरक का मानदेय भुगतान रोक दिया गया था.
जब महिला प्रेरक का मानदेय भुगतान नहीं किया गया तो उसने मा0 उच्च न्यायालय की शरण ली. जिसमे न्यायलय ने कार्यप्रमाण पत्र के आधार पर मानदेय भुगतान का आदेश दिया. प्रकरण में contempt हो जाने से 18 सितम्बर को BSA महोदय को न्यायलय में उपस्थित होना है.

जांच में प्रथम दृष्टतया यह पाया गया कि जितनी अवधि के लिए चयन किया गया था उससे दो वर्ष अधिक का कार्य प्रमाणित कर दिया गया है.. कार्यप्रमाण पत्र जारी करने वाले दो शिक्षकों श्री श्रवन प्रसाद (प्रधानाध्यापक, PMV महारानी और श्री शफाउद्दीन अंसारी को निलंबित करने की संस्तुति खंड शिक्षा अधिकारी पडरौना द्वारा कर दी गयी है. आज शाम तक निलंबन के आदेश जारी हो जाने की संभावना है.

शिक्षकों को विभाग द्वारा यह जानकारी या आदेश ही नहीं मिला कि सत्र 2011-12 और 2012-13 तक ही इनसे कार्य लिया जाना था. सत्र 2013-14 और 2014-15 के लिए सम्बंधित महिला प्रेरक का नवीनीकरण ही नहीं हुआ है.
ग़लतफ़हमी के चलते इनके द्वारा कार्यप्रमाण पत्र जारी कर दिया गया..

विभागीय गलती से दो शिक्षक निलंबन के दरवाजे पर खड़े हैं. अधिकारीगण पूरे प्रकरण में (अपनी) सुरक्षा की मुद्रा में हैं. आखिरकार यह उच्च न्यायालय का मामला है...

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. - 29

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 522 of 2014

Appellant :- Smt. Shashi Tiwari 

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. 

Counsel for Appellant :- N.K. Pandey 

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh,Tariq Maqbool Khan

Hon'ble Sunil Ambwani,J. 

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J. 

1. This Special Appeal is reported to be beyond time by 54 days. The delay has been sufficiently explained on the ground of poverty and consequential financial constraints of the appellant to approach the Court. We find that the delay has been sufficiently explained and is accordingly condoned. The appeal will be given regular number. 

2. The petitioner was appointed as "Prerak" (Female) in National Literacy Mission Programme vide appointment letter dated 7.2.2011 on one of two posts in Village Badawalia Khurd, Padrauna upto the period 31.3.2012, on an honorarium of Rs.2000/- per month to be paid through bank. Her appointment was made after selections made by the Gaon Sabha with her work place at Primary School in the Village Panchayat. It is submitted that the appointment was renewed in the year 2012, and thereafter in 2013. 

3. For the year 2014 directions were issued to include all the 1230 posts of 'Preraks' for renewal vide letter dated 1.1.2014, of the District Education and Training Centre/Secretary, District Public Education Committee, Kushi Nagar. He directed all the Pradhans/Chairmen, the Principal/Secretary of Gram Panchayat Lok Shiksha Samiti to submit proposals for renewal of all such persons along with their recommendations. The petitioner's application was included for renewal along with the recommendation of the Gram Pradhan. 

4. It is stated that the petitioner is working since 2011. She, however, has not been paid honorarium. The other person working in the village as 'Prerak' (Male) is getting honorarium regularly. The writ petition was dismissed on the ground that the reliefs claimed were vague and abstract and that it has not been indicated on what post the petitioner wants salary/honorarium. 

5. Prima facie we find that learned Single Judge did not look into the contents of the writ petition and the documents in which it is clearly stated that the petitioner was selected as 'Prerak' (Female) since the year 2010. She has also annexed appointment letter and the proposal for renewal.
6. Notice on behalf of State respondents has been accepted by learned Standing Counsel. Shri Sunil Kumar Singh appears for respondent no.3. 

7. The respondents are directed to allow appellant to continue and to either pay the honorarium to the petitioner, or show cause by filing counter affidavit within four weeks.

 
8. List on 23.7.2014.

 
Order Date :- 26.5.2014
RKP

उक्त आदेश के अनुपालन न होने पर दाखिल अवमानना याचिका 

Court No. - 5

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4021 of 2015

Applicant :- Smt. Shashi Tiwari

Opposite Party :- Lalji Yadav, D.B.E.O./ D.L.S.S.K., Thru. Secretary

Counsel for Applicant :- N.K. Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sunil Kumar Singh

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.

Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant.
The present contempt application has been filed for punishing the Opposite
Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 26.5.2014
passed by this Court in Special Appeal Defective No. 522 of 2014 (Smt.
Shashi Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) by which this Court has passed
the following order :-

" The respondents are directed to allow appellant to continue and to either
pay the honorarium to the petitioner, or show cause by filing counter affidavit
within four weeks ."

In view of the allegations made in the supporting affidavit to the contempt
application, prima facie, a case for punishing the opposite party for willful
disobedience of the judgment and order dated 26.5.2014 passed by this Court
in Special Appeal Defective No. 522 of 2014 (Smt. Shashi Tiwari Vs. State of
U.P. and 3 others) is made out.

Issue notice to the opposite party to show cause as to why charges be not
framed under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for punishing him for
willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 26.5.2014 passed by this
Court in Special Appeal Defective No. 522 of 2014 (Smt. Shashi Tiwari Vs.
State of U.P. and 3 others).

List on the date fixed by the office in the notice.

Order Date :- 29.7.2015
dhirendra/-